<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The crisis in e-health standards II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wolandscat.net/2009/10/01/the-crisis-in-e-health-standards-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wolandscat.net/2009/10/01/the-crisis-in-e-health-standards-ii/</link>
	<description>thoughts on culture and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Microsoft Healthvault Do a Better Job than HL7? &#124; HL7 Blog</title>
		<link>http://wolandscat.net/2009/10/01/the-crisis-in-e-health-standards-ii/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can Microsoft Healthvault Do a Better Job than HL7? &#124; HL7 Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolandscat.net/?p=37#comment-1079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part II of the Wolandscat series on &#8220;The Crisis in E-Health Standards&#8221; continues the argument of Part I, discussed already here, to the effect that software engineers should be the ones engaged in building e-Health standards &#8212; and not (for example) quasi-governmental committees involving members with &#8216;limited engineering skills&#8217; and utilizing a methodology based on democratic votes. The task, as should by now be clear, is orders of magnitude too complex to be left to committees and to committee votes. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part II of the Wolandscat series on &#8220;The Crisis in E-Health Standards&#8221; continues the argument of Part I, discussed already here, to the effect that software engineers should be the ones engaged in building e-Health standards &#8212; and not (for example) quasi-governmental committees involving members with &#8216;limited engineering skills&#8217; and utilizing a methodology based on democratic votes. The task, as should by now be clear, is orders of magnitude too complex to be left to committees and to committee votes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Microsoft Healthvault Do a Better Job than HL7?</title>
		<link>http://wolandscat.net/2009/10/01/the-crisis-in-e-health-standards-ii/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can Microsoft Healthvault Do a Better Job than HL7?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolandscat.net/?p=37#comment-576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part II of the Wolandscat series on &#8220;The Crisis in E-Health Standards&#8221; continues the argument of Part I, discussed already here, to the effect that software engineers should be the ones engaged in building e-Health standards &#8212; and not (for example) quasi-governmental committees involving members with &#8216;limited engineering skills&#8217; and utilizing a methodology based on democratic votes. The task, as should by now be clear, is orders of magnitude too complex to be left to committees and to committee votes. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part II of the Wolandscat series on &#8220;The Crisis in E-Health Standards&#8221; continues the argument of Part I, discussed already here, to the effect that software engineers should be the ones engaged in building e-Health standards &#8212; and not (for example) quasi-governmental committees involving members with &#8216;limited engineering skills&#8217; and utilizing a methodology based on democratic votes. The task, as should by now be clear, is orders of magnitude too complex to be left to committees and to committee votes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

