14/12/2011
The Clinical Information Modelling Initiative (CIMI) group led by Dr Stan Huff (Intermountain Health, Utah) met here in London 29 Nov – 1 Dec to make a final decision on formalism, from the two remaining – openEHR archetypes and various forms of UML (previous posts on CIMI: DCMs & RM, on formalisms). Instead of simply choosing one, the group made a more strategic choice of designating openEHR ADL/AOM 1.5 as the core formalism, with a corresponding profile of UML being developed to enable the more numerous UML-based developers (e.g. VA, NHS etc) to use archetypes within their UML toolchains.
Here is the public announcement resulting from this meeting.
Read the rest of this entry »
1 Comment | 
Computing, Health Informatics, openehr | Tagged: archetype, DCM, e-health, Health Informatics, openEHR | 
Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
14/11/2011
In recent weeks, the Clinical Information Modelling Initiative (CIMI), led by Stan Huff, has followed its stated process and is nearing a voting process in which a shared health domain modelling formalism is chosen. Proponents of each of the candidate formalisms have been asked to post arguments supporting their work.
A supporting statement for openEHR archetypes as the optimal formalism is posted
here, on the CIMI wiki. We have not included any beautiful tool-based views, nor even the ‘latest and best clinical models’, following Stan’s request for the ‘raw’ technical view of the syntax. Accordingly, the only thing with even any colour in it is
these screenshots of an ADL archetype in a raw text editor, with syntax highlighting on.
Leave a Comment » | Health Informatics, openehr | Tagged: 13606, archetype, e-health, Health Informatics, ISO 21090, models, standards | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
11/09/2011
Following the DCM meeting convened by Dr Stan Huff (Intermountain Healthcare) in Washington in July, reported in an earlier blog post, there is a further meeting this week in San Diego, which will discuss the issues of ‘data types’ and ‘reference models’ for the purpose of DCM (detailed clinical models).
I created two slideshows to explain my views on these matters (DCM_and_data_types and DCM_and_reference_model [both PDF]). Below is an extract of my arguments in these slideshows, based on experience, for adopting a particular approach to data types and reference model within the stated mission the DCM forum, which is to find formalism and attendant models in which to express universally shareable detailed clinical models. Naturally, my view on ‘the answer’ to that question is ‘openEHR (ADL/AOM) archetypes, templates and terminology’, but what I am providing below is not an argument supporting that, but one proposing how to proceed with respect to the ‘underlying models’.
Read the rest of this entry »
1 Comment | Health Informatics, openehr | Tagged: archetype, CEN, DCM, Health Informatics, HL7, ISO, ISO 21090, models, openEHR | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
10/08/2011
Every so often, someone asks: why can’t the health sector get its act together with ICT? Tell me why health is ‘different’?
Dilbert - advances in healthcare
Every so often a new and interesting answer to this question pops up… Read the rest of this entry »
4 Comments | Health Informatics, Philosophy | Tagged: e-health, EHRs, Health Informatics | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
08/06/2011
Let’s talk about mindmaps and archetypes. Mindmaps seem to be fuzzy and friendly – we need them because they are incredibly efficient at transmitting information to humans. Archetypes seem über-mathematical, but we need them to do proper model-based computing.
Read the rest of this entry »
1 Comment | Computing, Health Informatics, openehr | Tagged: archetype, DCM, e-health, Health Informatics, models, openEHR | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
03/06/2011
The New Zealand e-health programme architecture task-force has published its Working Interoperability Reference Architecture blueprint document. With respect to the document and the comments posted (I tried to post myself, but the comment disappeared), it seems worth making a couple of points on DCMs, of whatever flavour. If a DCM is to be expressed in a way useful to building and managing health IT infrastructure, there are two possibilities. Read the rest of this entry »
5 Comments | Health Informatics, openehr | Tagged: archetype, DCM, e-health, Health Informatics, HL7, openEHR, standards | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
24/05/2011
Software developers and ontologists generally live in two different worlds. The former group think they are building systems to perform information processing and computation, and the latter group think they are formally describing some aspect of the world.
[Note: slight change to wording of FOPP on 30/May/2011]
Read the rest of this entry »
9 Comments | Computing, Health Informatics | Tagged: Health Informatics, HL7, ontologies, software engineering, standards | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
18/05/2011
Previous: HL7 null flavors part 1
Null flavors – Objection #3: ontological problems
The following table shows the current HL7v3 null flavor values. A full version of the table appears in Grahame Grieve’s blog post. Read the rest of this entry »
4 Comments | Computing, Health Informatics, openehr | Tagged: data types, Health Informatics, HL7, ISO 21090, models, openEHR, standards | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
18/05/2011
(With apologies to those who use international English and normally spell it as ‘flavour’; in this post, I will spell it properly in informal text, and in the US way when referring to the formal HL7 null flavour concept.)
Grahame Grieve has pointed out in a recent blog post that I am a major critic of HL7 ‘null flavours’. This is correct, but the reasons are probably misunderstood, so I will try to clarify here. Read the rest of this entry »
7 Comments | Computing, Health Informatics, openehr | Tagged: data types, Health Informatics, HL7, ISO, ISO 21090, models, openEHR, standards | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
05/05/2011
One of the age-old debates in health informatics: can there be ‘one information model’ for shared clinical information? Some dream of a model to rule them all, uniting standards efforts, while others dismiss the idea as impossible or unrealistic. Obviously inside deployed health/hospital information (and all other – lab, GP, nursing, billing, PAS etc) products, there are private, differing information models. These do not concern us. Read the rest of this entry »
4 Comments | Health Informatics | Tagged: e-health, Health Informatics, models, openEHR, standards | Permalink
Posted by wolandscat
wolandscat
