Subscribe
-
Past Posts
- Towards a standard analysis of computable guidelines, clinical workflow, decision support and … the curly braces problem
- FHIR Fixes – the choice construct part I
- FHIR fixes: why a type hierarchy would help
- FHIR Fixes – the Observation.value problem
- Fixes for FHIR – the Admin Resources
- Why using HIT standards fails to achieve interoperability
- Improving Process State Representation in FHIR
Categories
- Computing (38)
- Culture (3)
- decision support (1)
- FHIR (18)
- Health Informatics (86)
- openehr (60)
- Philosophy (6)
- Politics (2)
- standards (42)
- Uncategorized (2)
Recent Comments
- Kevin Coonan MD on Does anyone actually understand what terminology is for?
- wolandscat on Does anyone actually understand what terminology is for?
- Kevin Coonan MD on Does anyone actually understand what terminology is for?
- wolandscat on Goodbye to Adobe FrameMaker, Hello AsciiDoctor
- Michael Joseph Murano on Goodbye to Adobe FrameMaker, Hello AsciiDoctor
General ICT
Health IT
Technology
Tag Archives: terminology
Semantic scalability – the core challenge in e-health?
A few months ago I posted on what makes a standard or set of standards in e-health investible. The headline requirements I can summarise as follows: platform-based: the standards must work together in a single coherent technical ecosystem, based on … Continue reading
Posted in Health Informatics, openehr, standards
Tagged archetype, e-health, Health Informatics, models, ontology, openEHR, snomed ct, standards, terminology
10 Comments
Does anyone actually understand what terminology is for?
I really wonder sometimes. A few months ago, an international organisation that has been looking at how to solve the requirement for scalable, sustainable content modelling (research data sets) did some trialling on the use of archetypes. This worked fine … Continue reading
Posted in Health Informatics
Tagged epistemology, Health Informatics, ontology, terminology
11 Comments
wolandscat