-
Join 1,155 other subscribers
Subscribe
-
Past Posts
- Why using expressions in workflow is wrong
- A Lingua Franca for e-health takes shape with GraphiteHealth
- The Health IT Platform – a definition
- What is interoperability?
- Directions in clinical guideline programming – CHA2DS2-VASc
- Design-by-Contract (DbC) v Test-Driven Design (TDD)
- Software – from Development to Use and Ownership
Categories
- Computing (43)
- Culture (3)
- decision support (3)
- FHIR (19)
- Health Informatics (92)
- openehr (66)
- Philosophy (7)
- Politics (2)
- standards (48)
- Uncategorized (2)
- workflow (1)
Recent Comments
- David Kerr on Design-by-Contract (DbC) v Test-Driven Design (TDD)
- Athanasios Anastasiou on Why using expressions in workflow is wrong
- wolandscat on Why using expressions in workflow is wrong
- Athanasios Anastasiou on Why using expressions in workflow is wrong
- wolandscat on Towards a standard analysis of computable guidelines, clinical workflow, decision support and … the curly braces problem
General ICT
Health IT
Technology
Tag Archives: openEHR
Why using expressions in workflow is wrong
One of the basic elements of design common to all workflow languages, including YAWL and BPMN, is the inclusion of logical expressions on decision nodes. This seems harmless, and we followed it in openEHR’s Task Planning specifications. However, it is … Continue reading
Posted in openehr, standards, workflow
Tagged BPMN, DMN, Health Informatics, openEHR, standards, workflow
3 Comments
A Lingua Franca for e-health takes shape with GraphiteHealth
Colleagues in e-health often say to me: why don’t you make openEHR easier to map to <insert popular interop standard> (used to be HL7v3, then HL7 CDA, now, HL7 FHIR… DSTU2/3/4/5?). To which I usually reply: if you are implying … Continue reading
Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, openehr, standards
Tagged archetype, CEM, graphite, openEHR
4 Comments
Aide Memoire for Computable Domain Models
Sometimes a graphic is worth more than words. This is an attempt to capture all the salient features of multi-level modelling, the openEHR way. See the openEHR primer for the story. Although this is ‘our way’ of doing it, I … Continue reading
Towards a standard analysis of computable guidelines, clinical workflow, decision support and … the curly braces problem
Why don’t we have widespread clinical decision support (CDS), computable guidelines, clinical workflow (plans), and why don’t the pieces we do have talk to the health record? The first time I heard such challenges framed was around 2000, and even … Continue reading
Posted in decision support, Health Informatics, openehr, standards
Tagged BPM+, care pathway, care plan, decision support, EHR, guidelines, openEHR
10 Comments
Why using HIT standards fails to achieve interoperability
I started working in the Health IT area in 1994, on a major European Commission funded project. I attended years of standards meetings at HL7, CEN and occasionally OMG and ISO from 1999 to about 2012. And I’ve observed the … Continue reading
Improving Process State Representation in FHIR
In this post I document further observations on the FHIR resources, made during the transcription of the DSTU4 FHIR resources to the BMM format used in openEHR, as described here. This post examines the definition of process state in FHIR … Continue reading
Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, openehr, standards
Tagged fhir, openEHR, process, workflow
Leave a comment
FHIR versus the EHR
One of the many things the FHIR silver bullet hype claims FHIR will solve is the EHR, along with Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Care Pathways, and who knows, paving driveways and launching spacecraft. I have made various arguments against silver … Continue reading
FHIR v openEHR – concreta
Some readers may have read my previous post FHIR compared to openEHR. If not, I recommend you do, it is available in Spanish, Japanese and Chinese as well as English. Here I aim to clarify some of the concrete differences … Continue reading
Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, openehr
Tagged e-health, fhir, openEHR, platform, standards
2 Comments
Why the platform will replace today’s interoperability standards in healthcare
For decades, most of us working in health informatics and e-health have lived on the assumption that ‘interoperability’ is one of the main things we are trying to achieve, and that it is the most important because the lack of … Continue reading
Posted in Computing, FHIR, Health Informatics, openehr, standards
Tagged fhir, interoperability, ISO, openEHR, platform, standards
9 Comments
openEHR Basic Meta-Model (BMM) and syntax major upgrade
The openEHR Basic Meta-Model (BMM) that has been in use in some form for nearly 10 years now was recently upgraded to version 3.0.0 (from 2.x), with the persistence format (now called P_BMM) being backwards-compatibly upgraded to version 2.3. The … Continue reading