Category Archives: FHIR

A Lingua Franca for e-health takes shape with GraphiteHealth

Posted on 15/05/2022 by wolandscat

Colleagues in e-health often say to me: why don’t you make openEHR easier to map to <insert popular interop standard> (used to be HL7v3, then HL7 CDA, now, HL7 FHIR… DSTU2/3/4/5?). To which I usually reply: if you are implying … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, openehr, standards | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

FHIR Fixes – the choice construct part I

Posted on 09/03/2020 by wolandscat

I have posted before on the FHIR ‘choice’ construct, particularly here, where I have explained the problems of the choice construct (essentially: it’s an ad hoc constraint construct that subverts the type system, and doesn’t belong in typed formalisms; none … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

FHIR fixes: why a type hierarchy would help

Posted on 14/11/2019 by wolandscat

One of the principal reasons for why I and others are proposing (some) type hierarchy in the FHIR Admin resources is as follows (my earlier post on this). Working Groups (i.e. committees) building Resources are currently in the situation of … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, standards | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

FHIR Fixes – the Observation.value problem

Posted on 12/09/2019 by wolandscat

As described in some detail in this earlier post on the FHIR formalism, a number of FHIR Resources contain ‘choice’ attributes of the form attribute[x], such as the one shown above in Observation. These are mapped in the FHIR UML … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, openehr, standards | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Fixes for FHIR – the Admin Resources

Posted on 11/09/2019 by wolandscat

In this post I revisit the issues with the FHIR Resources described in the earlier post – A FHIR experience: models or just definitions? To summarise: FHIR has no semantic inheritance, only a generic structural inheritance of Resources from abstract … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, standards | 5 Comments

Improving Process State Representation in FHIR

Posted on 08/06/2019 by wolandscat

In this post I document further observations on the FHIR resources, made during the transcription of the DSTU4 FHIR resources to the BMM format used in openEHR, as described here. This post examines the definition of process state in FHIR … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, openehr, standards | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

FHIR versus the EHR

Posted on 24/05/2019 by wolandscat

One of the many things the FHIR silver bullet hype claims FHIR will solve is the EHR, along with Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Care Pathways, and who knows, paving driveways and launching spacecraft. I have made various arguments against silver … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, openehr, standards | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

A FHIR Experience – the formalism

Posted on 08/05/2019 by wolandscat

This post continues the review presented in the previous post, where I looked at the Administrative resources of FHIR. Here I take a look at the formalism used in FHIR, i.e. how the resources (and profiles) are formally expressed. FHIR … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, standards | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A FHIR experience: models or just definitions?

Posted on 06/05/2019 by wolandscat

This is a second instalment of a technical review of the HL7 FHIR resources. As described in the previous post, this review is the result of an element-by-element transcription of the FHIR DSTU4 resources to the openEHR BMM (Basic-meta Model) … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, standards | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

A FHIR experience: consistently inconsistent

Posted on 05/05/2019 by wolandscat

In recent work I am involved in, the HL7 FHIR DSTU4 resources were converted to the openEHR formalism known as Basic Meta-Model (BMM), which is published as an open specification. BMM is an object-oriented formalism, conceptually similar to UML (minus … Continue reading →

Posted in FHIR, Health Informatics, standards | Tagged , , | 4 Comments